Social Surveys – Benefits and Disadvantages. The Theoretical Features Of Personal Studies

Social Surveys – Benefits and Disadvantages. The Theoretical Features Of Personal Studies

Personal studies are really a quantitative, positivist research technique composed of structured questionnaires and interviews. This post considers the theoretical, practical and ethical benefits and drawbacks of utilizing social studies in social research.

Detachment, Objectivity and Validity

Positivists favour questionnaires because they’re a detached and objective (unbiased) technique, where in fact the sociologist’s individual participation with participants is held to at least.

Hypothesis Testing

Questionnaires are specially helpful for testing hypotheses about cause and impact relationships between various factors, considering that the fact us to find correlations that they are quantifiable allows.

As an example, according to federal federal federal government data on academic success we realize that white males on complimentary School dishes achieve at a dramatically reduced degree than Chinese girls on complimentary class dishes. We fairly hypothesise that the reason being variations in parental attitudes – Chinese moms and dads may appreciate training more very, and so they might be stricter with kids in terms of research in comparison to parents that are white. Good questionnaire design and appropriate sampling would allow us to try this hypothesis out. Good sampling would further let us see if those white working course guys that do well have moms and dads with comparable attitudes to those Chinese girls that do well.


Questionnaires let the researcher to get information from a big amount of people, and so the outcomes is more agent of this wider populace than with additional qualitative practices. Nevertheless, all of this depends upon appropriate sampling strategies getting used and also the scientists having understanding of exactly how really completes the questionnaire.


Questionnaires are usually regarded as one essay writer of the most dependable methods of data collection – then they should give similar results if repeated by another researcher. There are two main reasons that are main this:

If the scientific studies are duplicated, it is possible to make use of the precise exact same questionnaire meaning the respondents are expected the very same concerns in the same purchase plus they have actually the exact same selection of responses.

With self-completion concerns, particularly those delivered by post, there isn’t any researcher present to influence the outcome.

The dependability of questionnaires means then we can be reasonably certain that this is because the opinions of the respondents have changed over time if we do find differences in answers. This is exactly why, questionnaires are really a method that is good conducting longitudinal research where modification in the long run is calculated.

Practical Advantages

Questionnaires certainly are a fast and low priced way of collecting considerable amounts of information from many individuals, regardless of if they’ve been commonly dispersed geographically in the event that questionnaire is delivered by post or carried out online. It is hard to observe how any kind of research technique could offer 10s of millions of reactions as it is the actual situation utilizing the British census that is national.

Into the context of training, Connor and Dewson (2001) posted nearly 4000 questionnaires to pupils at 14 degree organizations within their study associated with the facets which influenced class that is working to wait college.

With self-completion questionnaires there’s no necessity to recruit and train interviewers, which decreases price.

The information is quick to analyse when it was gathered. With on line questionnaires, pre-coded concerns could be updated real time.

Ethical Problems

Whenever a respondent is given a questionnaire, its fairly apparent that scientific studies are happened, so informed permission is not normally a presssing problem so long as researchers are honest in regards to the reason for the study.

Additionally, it is a method that is relatively unobtrusive offered the detachment regarding the researcher, and it’s also quite a straightforward matter for participants to simply ignore questionnaires when they don’t desire to complete them.

Theoretical Drawbacks of Questionnaires

Problems affecting credibility – Interpretivists make an amount of criticisms of questionnaires

Firstly you have the imposition problem – once the researcher chooses the relevant concerns, they truly are determining what is very important as opposed to the respondent, along with shut ended concerns the respondent has got to fit their responses into what’s being offered. The effect is the fact that respondent may possibly not be able to go to town when you look at the method that would you like to. The dwelling associated with questionnaire therefore distorts the respondents’ definitions and undermines the credibility of this information

Next, Interpretivists argue that the detached nature of questionnaires plus the not enough close contact between researcher and respondent implies that it is impossible to ensure that the participants are interpreting the concerns within the same manner as the researcher. This is especially valid where highly complex subjects are participating – If we tick ‘yes’ that i’m Christian’ – this may suggest a variety of things – from my being baptised yet not practising or really thinking to being truly a devout Fundamentalist. Because of this reason Interpretivists typically choose qualitative practices where researchers can be found to explain definitions and probe deeper.

Thirdly, scientists might not be current to test whether participants are providing answers that are socially desirable or just lying, or to always check that is actually finishing the questionnaire. At the very least with interviews scientists can be found to check on through to these nagging problems(by watching body gestures or probing further for instance)

Problems impacting representativeness

Postal questionnaires in particular can suffer with a response rate that is low. For instance, Shere Hite’s (1991) research of ‘love, passion, and psychological violence’ within the America sent 100, 000 questionnaires but just 4.5% of those had been came back.

All self-completion questionnaires additionally suffer with the situation of the self-selecting test which helps make the study unrepresentative – particular forms of individuals are almost certainly going to finish questionnaires – literate individuals for instance, people who have the required time, or individuals who have a confident feeling of self-esteem whenever completing questionnaires.

Practical Difficulties With Questionnaires

The reality that questionnaires must be brief means it is possible to just ever get reasonably trivial information they will need to be combined with more qualitative methods to achieve more insight from them, thus for many topics.

Although questionnaires certainly are a fairly low priced as a type of gathering data, it may be essential to provide incentives for individuals to come back them.

Structured Interviews are somewhat more expensive than self-completion questionnaires.

Ethical Problems With questionnaires

These are typically most readily useful prevented when researching delicate subjects.

Related Articles

An Introduction to Social Surveys – Definition and Basic Types of Survey

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.